<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair &gt; Under severe regulatory body scrutiny &gt; Cost effectiveness as a function of cost and clinical benefit &gt; National Institute of Clinical Excellence NICE &gt; Unfit for open repair and not high risk &gt; Endovascular Aneurysm Repair EVAR Trials &gt; Dutch Randomized Endovascular Aneurysm Management DREAM &gt; Open Versus Endovascular Repair OVER trial &gt; Multi-center experience &gt; Cook &gt; Medtronic &gt; Gore</title>
	<link>http://www.ideasforsurgery.com/2008/07/11/endovascular-abdominal-aortic-aneurysm-repair-under-severe-regulatory-body-scrutiny-cost-effectiveness-as-a-function-of-cost-and-clinical-benefit-national-institute-of-clinical-excellence-nice/</link>
	<description>Clinical Needs &#62; Innovative Answers</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 08:53:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.3</generator>

</channel>
</rss>
