<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PlasmaBlade &gt; Tissue Dissection Device &gt; Less collateral thermal injury &gt; PEAK Surgical &gt; Receives 510k Clearance &gt; PEAK Surgery System &gt; Use in Expanded   Indications &gt; Plastic &gt; Reconstructive &gt; ENT &gt; Gynecologic &gt; Orthopedic &gt; Arthroscopic &gt; Spinal &gt; Neurological Surgical Procedures &gt; Abdominoplasty or tummy   tucks &gt; Lower temperature associated with the PlasmaBlade &gt; Compared with traditional electrosurgery</title>
	<link>http://www.ideasforsurgery.com/2008/12/19/plasmablade-tissue-dissection-device-less-collateral-thermal-injury-peak-surgical-receives-510k-clearance-peak-surgery-system-use-in-expanded-indications-plastic-reconstructive-ent/</link>
	<description>Clinical Needs &#62; Innovative Answers</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 11:22:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.3</generator>

</channel>
</rss>
