<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FAME Study Published in New England Journal of Medicine &gt; Fractional flow reserve FFR versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation &gt; FFR-guided PCI improves outcomes &gt; compared to standard angiography-guided PCI &gt; Primary clinical endpoint &gt; Coronary Arteriosclerosis &gt; Intervention Device &gt; Fractional flow reserve FFR &gt; FFR an index for functional severity of coronary stenoses &gt; Mmeasured by PressureWire &gt; Radi Medical Systems now part of St. Jude Medical Cardiovascular Division</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ideasforsurgery.com/2009/01/16/fame-study-published-in-new-england-journal-of-medicine-fractional-flow-reserve-ffr-versus-angiography-for-multivessel-evaluation-ffr-guided-pci-improves-outcomes-compared-to-standard-angiograp/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ideasforsurgery.com/2009/01/16/fame-study-published-in-new-england-journal-of-medicine-fractional-flow-reserve-ffr-versus-angiography-for-multivessel-evaluation-ffr-guided-pci-improves-outcomes-compared-to-standard-angiograp/</link>
	<description>News About Medical Device Management And Development</description>
	<lastBuildDate></lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
</channel>
</rss>

